From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Jan 15 05:42:11 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id FAA13638
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 15 Jan 1996 05:42:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id FAA13626
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 15 Jan 1996 05:42:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id FAA03062; Mon, 15 Jan 1996 05:41:53 -0800
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com>
cc: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>, hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FBSD 2.1 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 15 Jan 1996 10:20:27 +0100."
             <273.821697627@critter.tfs.com> 
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 1996 05:41:53 -0800
Message-ID: <3060.821713313@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> we have unzip in the kernel...

Well, yeah, but we can still take it out easily - it's controlled by a
kernel option, and not critical to system function.  What happens if
we make every package a zip file then get a nasty note?  We've got all
those packages rendered sort of useless.

Also, as a point of fact, I thought the unzip we were using was just
the uncompression part, not the unarchiving part.

					Jordan