From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Feb 18 21:10:58 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4A2A106566B;
	Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:10:58 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gavin@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89FCE8FC08;
	Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:10:58 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gavin@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gavin@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n1ILAwWx085809;
	Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:10:58 GMT
	(envelope-from gavin@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gavin@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n1ILAw7t085805;
	Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:10:58 GMT (envelope-from gavin)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:10:58 GMT
Message-Id: <200902182110.n1ILAw7t085805@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: gavin@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org
From: gavin@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: kern/131817: ipfw blocks layer2 packets that should not be
	blocked
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:10:59 -0000

Synopsis: ipfw blocks layer2 packets that should not be blocked

Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-ipfw
Responsible-Changed-By: gavin
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Feb 18 21:01:17 UTC 2009
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
Over to maintainer(s).  To submitter: FWIW, I agree that this
does seem like incorrect behaviour.  I usually work around it
with the following additional rule:

ipfw add 10 allow ip from any to any layer2 mac-type arp


http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=131817