From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 18 19:38:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DB6016A41F for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 19:38:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC12543D46 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 19:38:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id j9IJf8b58820; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 12:41:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Lee Capps" , "questions questions" Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 12:38:27 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <20051018122454.GA83298@topper.cteresource.org> Cc: Subject: RE: Can't see FreeBSD machine in Mac's Finder X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 19:38:32 -0000 Ah, then when the user 'cleans up' all those dot files from her Windows box that happens to be mounting the same volume exported via Samba, they become unusable! ;-) Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Lee Capps >Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 5:25 AM >To: questions questions >Subject: Re: Can't see FreeBSD machine in Mac's Finder > > >At 03:30 Tue 18 Oct 2005, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > >> Right, but a lot of Mac files still use that awful resource/data fork >> thing >> that some idiot at Apple dreamed up and that isn't supported under NFS >> that I'm aware. > >Oh, how I loathe those resource forks. I've been experimenting >with these resource forks a lot lately (why? a long, boring, and >pitiful tale), and I'm happy to report that the Mac actually >_does_ seem to preserve the resource forks over NFS. If I copy a >file called "file" with a resource fork over NFS to the file >server it also copies over a file called "._file" which seems to >contain all that nice metadata. > >Still, I don't trust it. > >Lee > >-- >Lee Capps >Technology Specialist >CTE Resource Center > > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. >Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.9/116 - Release Date: >9/30/2005 >