Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 22:45:32 -0700 From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> To: Marc Tardif <intmktg@CAM.ORG> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gdb instead of adb Message-ID: <199907150545.WAA00453@dingo.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 14 Jul 1999 22:26:44 EDT." <Pine.SOL.4.10.9907142220080.17292-100000@Stratus.CAM.ORG>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Is the reason why adb hasn't been ported to freebsd because the source is > proprietary? You make no sense. > If gdb should suffice for my debugging needs, how can a breakpoint be set > at a particular interrupt, or even at any interrupt? The break command > only seems to accept functions, offsets, linenumbers and addresses... > I'm all out of ideas and the gdb info file isn't helping. You make little more sense, unless you are talking about using gdb-remote on a running kernel, in which case you should know that interrupts are vectored through functions, and thus the entire issue is moot. Note also that debugging through interrupt handlers can be problematic on PC hardware. -- \\ The mind's the standard \\ Mike Smith \\ of the man. \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ -- Joseph Merrick \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907150545.WAA00453>