From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Feb  6 12:31:03 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08F3016A4CE
	for <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>; Fri,  6 Feb 2004 12:31:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from franklin-belle.com (adsl-65-68-247-73.dsl.crchtx.swbell.net
	[65.68.247.73])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F27543D54
	for <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>; Fri,  6 Feb 2004 12:30:46 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jacks@sage-american.com)
Received: from sagea (sagea.sage-american [10.0.0.3])
	by franklin-belle.com (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with SMTP id i16KTu0k003668;
	Fri, 6 Feb 2004 14:29:57 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from jacks@sage-american.com)
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20040206142953.01ea93b0@10.0.0.15>
X-Sender: jacks@10.0.0.15
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32)
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 14:29:53 -0600
To: "Vasenin Alexander aka BlackSir" <blacksir@number.ru>,
	"Luigi Rizzo" <rizzo@icir.org>, "Don Bowman" <don@sandvine.com>
From: "Jack L. Stone" <jacks@sage-american.com>
In-Reply-To: <NKEJKOHEKMBIMCCEHEPKKEJKCCAA.blacksir@number.ru>
References: <NKEJKOHEKMBIMCCEHEPKOEJJCCAA.blacksir@number.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=4.5 tests=AWL,J_CHICKENPOX_41,TW_PF 
	autolearn=ham version=2.63-sageame.rules_v3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63-sageame.rules_v3.1 (2004-01-11) on 
	franklin-belle.com
cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: Syntax to block 38 IPs
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions <freebsd-ipfw.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 20:31:03 -0000

Vasenin: Thanks again! My other email crossed with this and looks like
RedAlert may fix the problem themselves -- would be nice and I can forget
this one.

I want to get busy moving on up to IPFW2 and make use of some of the great
new syntax....

At 11:10 PM 2.6.2004 +0300, Vasenin Alexander aka BlackSir wrote:
>Mmmm.... of course
>2. ipfw deny ip from 209.102.202.0/24 to any
>    ipfw deny ip from 65.194.51.0/24 to any
>
>or
>2. ipfw deny ip from 209.102.202.0/24 to me
>    ipfw deny ip from 65.194.51.0/24 to me
>
>> > A follow-up question is that, if I do upgrade, will IPFW2 still
>> use my old
>> > rules until I can get around to tuning/tweaking...??
>In my case(i using ipfw rules to count traffic from our clients. small ISP
>company) - everything works perfect after upgrade ipfw1->ipfw2 with the same
>ruleset.
>
>

Best regards,
Jack L. Stone,
Administrator

Sage American
http://www.sage-american.com
jacks@sage-american.com