Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 15:53:50 -0700 (MST) From: "Chad R. Larson" <chad@DCFinc.com> To: christopher@schulte.org (Christopher Schulte) Cc: henk@home.cg.nu, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ssh RSA login faild! with keys HELP Message-ID: <200106092253.PAA22190@freeway.dcfinc.com> In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20010609161831.0256eec0@pop.schulte.org> from Christopher Schulte at "Jun 9, 1 04:37:19 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As I recall, Christopher Schulte wrote: > BTW: This is why I love the new RELENG_4_3. I second that. I think RELENG_4_3 is the perfect solution to the "-STABLE" vs "-RELEASE" branch trade-offs. There's been enough regular breakage in -stable to discourage me from trying to track it on production machines. And yet, security and serious bug fixes getting MFS (Merged From Stable) by yours truly in my own tree has been a bother. So let's cheer for the "-most_stable" branch! <Yey!> > The only thing I might suggest is offering 'critical *system* updates' > rather than just 'critical security updates' via RELENG_4_x patch > branch. I like the idea that only the Security Officer and the Release Engineer can commit to this branch. That seems about right to me. We'll see how it works in practice. As best I can tell, neither of them have found compelling reason to commit yet. -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm? chad@dcfinc.com chad@larsons.org larson1@home.com DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200106092253.PAA22190>