From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org  Wed Feb  8 13:34:19 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C127ACD6C19
 for <freebsd-fs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>; Wed,  8 Feb 2017 13:34:19 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0E721D0E
 for <freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org>; Wed,  8 Feb 2017 13:34:19 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v18DYJ1Y026332
 for <freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 13:34:19 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 216178] ZFS ARC and L2ARC are unrealistically large, maybe
 after r307265
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 13:34:19 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System
X-Bugzilla-Component: kern
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-STABLE
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People
X-Bugzilla-Who: lev@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-216178-3630-86gwi9efMK@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-216178-3630@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-216178-3630@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 13:34:19 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D216178

--- Comment #6 from Lev A. Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> ---
I could use another 750 EVO disk, whole 120GB one instead of partition on
250GB, in day or two (I'm waiting for additional HBA right now!).

Maybe, checksum errors is result of TRIM errors? Now this SSD doesn't have =
any
quirks in our (FreeBSD) sources, but its "big brothers" (like 850 EVO and 8=
50
PRO) are marked with "no TRIM with NCQ" (see discussion about this SSD and =
its
quirks here: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9478). But ZFS (zroot pool) on sa=
me
device (other partition) doesn't show any errors, I've checked it with "scr=
ub".

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=