From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Oct 18 20:27:11 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id UAA11675 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 18 Oct 1995 20:27:11 -0700 Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [192.216.222.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id UAA11660 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 1995 20:27:06 -0700 Received: from rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au (rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au [129.78.129.109]) by who.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.11) with ESMTP id UAA29723 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 1995 20:25:58 -0700 Received: (from dawes@localhost) by rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au (8.6.11/8.6.9) id NAA14906; Thu, 19 Oct 1995 13:21:24 +1000 From: David Dawes Message-Id: <199510190321.NAA14906@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au> Subject: Re: xterm dumps core To: ache@astral.msk.su (=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?=) Date: Thu, 19 Oct 1995 13:21:24 +1000 (EST) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from "=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?=" at Oct 19, 95 05:56:10 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 1090 Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk >In message <199510190237.MAA14718@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au> David > Dawes writes: > >>>In message <199510180847.SAA12056@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au> David >>> Dawes writes: >>> >>>>Does this mean that the default locale names have been changed in -current >>>>to include these underscores? On 2.0.5, they don't have them. If I do: >>> >>>Yes, locale names in current and stable conforms RFC 1700 (valid charset >>>names list registered by IANA). >>>ISO8859-1 is _invalid_ name. > >>I just checked a machine I have running a recent SNAP (951005), and it still >>uses the old names. Has this been changed in stable since then? > >It seems that you still have obsoleted names from previous versions. >You need to say "make distrib-dirs" in /usr/src/etc, remove >obsoleted dirs and re-build/install /usr/src/bin/{mklocale,colldef} and >/usr/src/share/timedef. I'm using to a clean install of the 2.1.0-951005-SNAP binary set, not one I built myself. It has only the old names, and not the new names. Is that SNAP incorrect in this regard? What will be in the 2.1.0 release? David