From owner-freebsd-scsi Wed Mar 1 0: 5:25 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mass.cdrom.com (mass.cdrom.com [204.216.28.184]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B06137BE24 for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2000 00:05:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.cdrom.com) Received: from mass.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA04782; Wed, 1 Mar 2000 00:05:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <200003010805.AAA04782@mass.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: "Kenneth D. Merry" Cc: scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: chio trap with not-ready changer In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 01 Mar 2000 00:03:04 PST." <200003010803.AAA04730@mass.cdrom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 00:05:18 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > > Looks like it might want a TEST UNIT READY to clear the condition? > > > > Not necessarily a test unit ready, but perhaps something other than mode > > sense or inquiry. > > > > *sigh* > > > > I still don't understand how the retry count is getting decremented. > > I think there's something basic wrong there, yes. Whatever it is also > seems to be inhibiting the TEST UNIT READY that your quirk entry is > trying to send. ... the rationale here being that if it was being sent and failing, we'd see an error from it, right? -- \\ Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. \\ Mike Smith \\ Tell him he should learn how to fish himself, \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ and he'll hate you for a lifetime. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message