From owner-freebsd-fs  Wed May 16  7:38:28 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16C7537B42C
	for <freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 16 May 2001 07:38:22 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au)
Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (bde.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.102])
	by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA22023;
	Thu, 17 May 2001 00:38:03 +1000
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 00:36:45 +1000 (EST)
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
X-Sender: bde@besplex.bde.org
To: Maxime Henrion <mux@qualys.com>
Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG, Stefan Parvu <sparvu@cc.hut.fi>
Subject: Re: UFS to FAT32
In-Reply-To: <20010516160603.A7637@nebula.cybercable.fr>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0105170028310.10162-100000@besplex.bde.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On Wed, 16 May 2001, Maxime Henrion wrote:

> Stefan Parvu wrote:

> The improvements in OpenBSD 2.9 are due to the new dirpref() code which
> has also been implemented in FreeBSD by McKusick a little before.

However, this is not in FreeBSD 4.3.

> > Another question is: Do we plan to add -async for mount_msdos ?
> 
> No idea.

Not soon.

Not writing the FAT by default gives half of the advantages and most
of the disadvantages of -async.

Bruce


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message