From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu May 15 22:20:49 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA09140
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 15 May 1997 22:20:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from caipfs.rutgers.edu (root@caipfs.rutgers.edu [128.6.155.100])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA09135
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 15 May 1997 22:20:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jenolan.caipgeneral (jenolan.rutgers.edu [128.6.111.5])
	by caipfs.rutgers.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id BAA06224;
	Fri, 16 May 1997 01:20:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by jenolan.caipgeneral (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id BAA00299; Fri, 16 May 1997 01:19:04 -0400
Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 01:19:04 -0400
Message-Id: <199705160519.BAA00299@jenolan.caipgeneral>
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@jenolan.rutgers.edu>
To: black@zen.cypher.net
CC: thorpej@nas.nasa.gov, pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co,
        rminnich@sarnoff.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.3.91.970516003914.15211E-100000@zen.cypher.net>
	(message from Ben Black on Fri, 16 May 1997 00:40:13 -0400 (EDT))
Subject: Re: Cluster Computing in BSD
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

   Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 00:40:13 -0400 (EDT)
   From: Ben Black <black@zen.cypher.net>

   the current RC5 distributed cracking effort shows quite clearly
   that something as advanced as MOSIX is not required.  if his logic
   is that bad guys will use MOSIX to crack encryption brute force
   then he is fooling himself.

And besides, as far as MO6 goes, all I have to say is that adb is your
friend...