Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:26:55 +0200 (SAT) From: John Hay <jhay@mikom.csir.co.za> To: peter@netplex.com.au (Peter Wemm) Cc: dillon@apollo.backplane.com (Matthew Dillon), alc@cs.rice.edu (Alan Cox), tlambert@primenet.com (Terry Lambert), bakul@torrentnet.com (Bakul Shah), julian@whistle.com, freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: high-efficiency SMP locks - submission for review Message-ID: <199906281926.VAA16677@zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za> In-Reply-To: <19990628171823.3445882@overcee.netplex.com.au> from Peter Wemm at "Jun 29, 1999 01:18:23 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > The 386, I doubt has it. There have been a couple of suggestions for ending > the support for the 386 as it will simplify some ugly code for emulating > kernel-mode write faults etc, but it's never happened. Apparently the > 386 is common in some areas still. The 386 is still used a lot in embeded systems. (With FreeBSD running on some of them. :-) John -- John Hay -- John.Hay@mikom.csir.co.za To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199906281926.VAA16677>