From owner-freebsd-ports Fri May 4 12:36:15 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from casimir.physics.purdue.edu (casimir.physics.purdue.edu [128.210.146.111]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E932F37B423; Fri, 4 May 2001 12:36:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from will@physics.purdue.edu) Received: by casimir.physics.purdue.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 239901BD1D; Fri, 4 May 2001 14:31:41 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 14:31:41 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: Eric Melville Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: port policies Message-ID: <20010504143140.J3246@casimir.physics.purdue.edu> Reply-To: Will Andrews Mail-Followup-To: Will Andrews , Eric Melville , FreeBSD Ports References: <200104300810.f3U8AGY60114@freefall.freebsd.org> <86elua4wf1.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> <20010430023347.A70094@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010504123304.B66630@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i In-Reply-To: <20010504123304.B66630@FreeBSD.org>; from eric@FreeBSD.org on Fri, May 04, 2001 at 12:33:04PM -0700 X-Operating-System: Linux 2.2.18 sparc64 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 12:33:04PM -0700, Eric Melville wrote: > Is it also accepted policy to NOT hardcode -j options to make? If not, can > we make it so? This is just asking for trouble in many cases. Sure. I think it's probably useful to add a "MAKE_JOBS" variable to bsd.port.mk so people who know what they are doing can use it easily. Regardless, I agree 100% with you on the -j thing. -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message