From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 05:34:43 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D20084FC for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 05:34:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail3.transactionware.com (mail.transactionware.com [203.14.245.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4336DEA4 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 05:34:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81166 invoked by uid 907); 11 Dec 2014 05:34:31 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO jmmacpro.tmst.com.au) (203.14.245.130) (smtp-auth username janm, mechanism plain) by mail3.transactionware.com (qpsmtpd/0.84) with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 16:34:31 +1100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\)) Subject: Re: bsdtar POLA change in 10.0? From: Jan Mikkelsen In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 16:34:55 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <5BEC32C8-3611-419C-A0C8-3AB4DA776A27@transactionware.com> References: <53171DAE.5070203@li.ru> <1394110822.21224.91297125.0B659AFB@webmail.messagingengine.com> <56BC2D25-7163-43A2-AB04-9A808AA98F85@gmail.com> To: Ronald Klop X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993) Cc: libarchive-discuss@googlegroups.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 05:34:43 -0000 > On 7 Mar 2014, at 20:42, Ronald Klop wrote: >=20 > On Thu, 06 Mar 2014 19:43:28 +0100, Warner Losh = wrote: >=20 >>=20 >> On Mar 6, 2014, at 6:00 AM, Mark Felder wrote: >>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014, at 6:50, Marat N.Afanasyev wrote: >>>> I wonder why >>>>=20 >>>> bsdtar --one-file-system >>>>=20 >>>> suddenly started to skip archiving of mount-points? And no mention = of >>>> such behaviour change either in UPDATING or errata :( >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>> --one-file-system >>> (c, r, and u modes) Do not cross mount points. >>>=20 >>> Isn't that what it's supposed to do? Skip any mounted filesystems? = Was >>> it broken before? Or do I simply not understand the behavior you're >>> seeing. >>=20 >> Before it would archive the directory where the other filesystem was = mounted, but nothing else. >>=20 >> Now it doesn=E2=80=99t archive that directory. >>=20 >> I believe this is a bug, since that directory (but nothing in it or = under it) still belongs to this filesystem... >>=20 >> Warner >=20 > I cc'ed libarchive-discuss@googlegroups.com for more exposure to the = issue. >=20 Reviving an old discussion =E2=80=94 this just caused my build process = for 10.1 to create root filesystems without /dev, which is obviously = constraining. Using the --one-file-system option should should preserve mount point = directories. Will this be fixed? Jan.