From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Dec 17 15:25:12 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id PAA04142
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 17 Dec 1995 15:25:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from haven.uniserve.com (haven.uniserve.com [198.53.215.121])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA04123
          Sun, 17 Dec 1995 15:25:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by haven.uniserve.com id <30740-2>; Sun, 17 Dec 1995 15:27:23 -0000
Date: 	Sun, 17 Dec 1995 15:27:17 -0800 (PST)
From: Tom Samplonius <tom@uniserve.com>
To: John Dyson <dyson@freefall.freebsd.org>
cc: paul@netcraft.co.uk, jkh@time.cdrom.com, andreas@knobel.gun.de,
        current@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, cracauer@wavehh.hanse.de,
        jkh@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: FreeBSD-current-stable ???
In-Reply-To: <199512171731.JAA09419@freefall.freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.951217152225.6817A-100000@haven.uniserve.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk


  While this discussion about -current is all very nice, but what I want 
to know, is anyone still doing bug-hunting through the -stable tree?

Tom