From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 24 19:11:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA041065673 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:11:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pw0-f54.google.com (mail-pw0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E09A8FC12 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:11:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pwj8 with SMTP id 8so4064557pwj.13 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 12:11:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=pLSZYpc1HHGExR9O+kYJY3xZ3eMzZkI7YEbVU6/LRpA=; b=ZhS4KWxfSD10+zch3bIlk1wDhtZuZtrMyXjhNUItzNxyfIGCL5dWRVXFmTE95pos1o wcYMPJsxoOREKxrs4LG2tIyXtXPYqsEIn0/UyhPlbfzBVT7Gn8HxbVnNn9vgHNL4N63+ 4BAl8WcJP6Nme66lKvyQTPhghwdeRQ1R8gA2I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=uIuK2yYZBPGCTOBVte4U2+UYoVFivaYZMw8/c8NX9ltPa4GUpD7/E4UZO6naeFHnvu oHG9gAepQIq6BXtOEKv6Q89+a74lSDrlFrlQM4fbiq+I5XofP49UDTRqT73CMWeeUsk5 /f2oSfrEWR6y43ASJ3SlDdUayHIyTfoIQYtQo= Received: by 10.68.18.201 with SMTP id y9mr3064578pbd.370.1306264270639; Tue, 24 May 2011 12:11:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pyunyh@gmail.com ([174.35.1.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 3sm5164545pbf.29.2011.05.24.12.11.08 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 24 May 2011 12:11:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pyunyh@gmail.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 24 May 2011 12:11:08 -0700 From: YongHyeon PYUN Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 12:11:08 -0700 To: linimon@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110524191108.GH10984@michelle.cdnetworks.com> References: <201105240930.p4O9UFiC015327@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201105240930.p4O9UFiC015327@freefall.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/157287: [re] re0: INVARIANTS panic (Memory modified after free) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pyunyh@gmail.com List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 19:11:11 -0000 On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 09:30:15AM +0000, linimon@freebsd.org wrote: > Old Synopsis: re0: INVARIANTS panic (Memory modified after free) > New Synopsis: [re] re0: INVARIANTS panic (Memory modified after free) > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net > Responsible-Changed-By: linimon > Responsible-Changed-When: Tue May 24 09:29:55 UTC 2011 > Responsible-Changed-Why: > Over to maintainer(s). > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=157287 > _______________________________________________ Because the size is 4092 I vaguely guess it was not caused by re(4). re(4) just uses either 2K or 9K clusters. Of course that does mean re(4) is bug free here. Given that submitter can see panic during booting which in turn means re(4) has little chance to run, it might not be re(4)'s fault.