From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 07:29:05 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31CD7FDB for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 07:29:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F35BD1326 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 07:29:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s827T4Ye097778 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 07:29:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 193212] [stage] sysutils/bsdconfig Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 07:29:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: portmaster@bsdforge.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Patch Ready X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 07:29:05 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193212 --- Comment #16 from C Hutchinson --- (In reply to John Marino from comment #15) > (In reply to Daniel Austin from comment #10) > > a simple 'make stage-qa' will give you the above info, or build using > > DEVELOPER=yes, or run it through poudriere. > > > > Specifically: Read that line again and again until you unstand what he > means. We've mentioned "make stage-qa" 50 times and it seems that it's > going over your head. OH. I understand. FWIW here is the make.conf(5) for poudriere DEVELOPER=yes USE_PORTLINT=yes USE_PACKAGE_DEPENDS=yes BATCH=yes WRKDIRPREFIX=/wrkdirs Am I missing anything? Why is there no poudriere.conf man page? I also can't find any "ports production" related material for poudriere. Only package related information. I really feel like the requirement for using poudriere, a bit premature. Given that the use of make(1) install/deinstall/stage/* plist/ {...} will frequently pollute the system it's on, and, as mentioned; the lack of pertinent info, where poudriere is concerned. I would probably have been better off using a dump(8) restore(8) scheme. To provide a fresh system to work in after thoroughly testing each port. Or perhaps devise some chroot(8) scheme. In short; I think I spent too much time attempting to employ a development scheme, on something that isn't [yet] readily adapted to, without a great deal of experimentation, trial, and error. Don't get me wrong, I am all too aware of that being a big part of general development. But in this case [poudriere] isn't [yet] the most expedient approach. Thanks for your thoughtful reply. --Chris P.S. I have no issue with your choice of Daniels patch, over mine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.