From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jan 20 16: 0:14 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C0E37B400 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 16:00:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 095B9533B; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 01:00:06 +0100 (CET) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: "Andrey A. Chernov" Cc: Mark Murray , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Step5, pam_opie OPIE auth fix for review References: <20020120220254.GA25886@nagual.pp.ru> <200201202314.g0KNEDt34526@grimreaper.grondar.org> <20020120233050.GA26913@nagual.pp.ru> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 21 Jan 2002 01:00:05 +0100 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Lines: 14 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: > In any case, if I understand what you're trying to do, it can be done > by returning PAM_SUCCESS if OPIE authentication succeeded, PAM_IGNORE > if it failed but Unix authentication is still allowed, and > PAM_AUTH_ERR if OPIE failed and Unix authentication is *not* allowed. > In that case, if you mark pam_opie "sufficient", pam_unix will run > only if OPIE authentication failed but allowed Unix authentication to > proceed. Hmm, actually, that won't do. I need to think this over some more. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message