From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 4 15:40:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CF7616A400 for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2006 15:40:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8238743D6D for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2006 15:40:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k34FeKaX029788 for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2006 15:40:20 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k34FeKPK029787; Tue, 4 Apr 2006 15:40:20 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 15:40:20 GMT Message-Id: <200604041540.k34FeKPK029787@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org From: Pav Lucistnik Cc: Subject: Re: docs/95275: Threading libraries in Porter's Handbook X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Pav Lucistnik List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 15:40:23 -0000 The following reply was made to PR docs/95275; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Pav Lucistnik To: Jean-Baptiste Quenot Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/95275: Threading libraries in Porter's Handbook Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 17:34:37 +0200 Jean-Baptiste Quenot p=ED=B9e v =FAt 04. 04. 2006 v 10:06 +0200: > * Pav Lucistnik: >=20 > > How many ports need this? I never seen this problem. I'd > > prefer not to add this to PH, if it's of minor impact. >=20 > All ports that need linking with threading libraries and that > use ld(1) for linking. This problem arose on www/resin2 and > www/resin3, I don't really understand why other ports are not > affected. But if you look at the man page ld(1) you will notice > that indeed -pthread is not an available option. If this only affects two ports, may I ask you to rephrase the entry to say something like If case the ld errors out with message about not undestanding -pthread, you may want to use gcc as... --=20 Pav Lucistnik A)bort, R)etry, H)it with big hammer