From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Sep 29 13:29:27 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF6D037B66C for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 13:29:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2470F1C76; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 16:29:23 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 16:29:23 -0400 From: Bill Fumerola To: Trevor Johnson Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Guidelines for new port version variables Message-ID: <20000929162923.J38472@jade.chc-chimes.com> References: <20000928172551.G38472@jade.chc-chimes.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from trevor@jpj.net on Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 09:57:15AM -0400 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.3-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 09:57:15AM -0400, Trevor Johnson wrote: > Bill Fumerola wrote: > > > We won't have FreeBSD 4.2.1 just because we had a 4.1.1, and we won't have > > FreeBSD 4.2.0, because the .0 is implied. > > $ uname -r > 4.0-20000214-CURRENT That's because we require a major and minor release number. We don't require a point release number. or Thats because we require a portname and portversion. We don't require a portrevision. The parallel stands. -- Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc. billf@chimesnet.com / billf@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message