From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 24 22:30:25 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09AC216A496; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:30:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB6AD13C480; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:30:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l9OMNb9r010291; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:23:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l9OMNYWZ010290; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:23:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:23:34 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: Ken Smith Message-ID: <20071024222334.GA9206@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <200710242042.l9OKgJPm017907@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> <1193258973.41270.40.camel@opus.cse.buffalo.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1193258973.41270.40.camel@opus.cse.buffalo.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Andrey Chernov , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" , Michal Varga , rafan@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Undefined symbol "__mb_sb_limit" during 7.0-BETA1 installworld X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:30:25 -0000 On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 04:49:33PM -0400, Ken Smith wrote: > On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 16:42 -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > > > On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 00:20 +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: > > > > Perhaps something is wrong in ISO making. > > > > > > Oops. Yes there is. New ones on the way. > > > > > > Sigh. > > > > > Will it be considered BETA2? Or BETA1 revised? > > I'll name it BETA1.5. > > > Is it possible to find out how the issue happened? > > I had a stupidity leak. > I think you have a new candidate for the fortune(6) database. I almost spit my coffee on the keyboard and monitor. It's also good to know that I haven't cornered the stupidity market :-) -- Steve