Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 09:42:12 +0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> Cc: Orit Moskovich <oritm@mellanox.com>, "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD spinlock - compatibility layer Message-ID: <519EC574.1070102@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <519C663E.1090307@FreeBSD.org> References: <981733489AB3BD4DB24B48340F53E0A55B0CFD79@MTLDAG01.mtl.com> <201305200950.26834.jhb@freebsd.org> <981733489AB3BD4DB24B48340F53E0A55B0D091F@MTLDAG01.mtl.com> <201305211220.16776.jhb@freebsd.org> <981733489AB3BD4DB24B48340F53E0A55B0D39EF@MTLDAG01.mtl.com> <519C663E.1090307@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/22/13 2:31 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 22/05/2013 09:14 Orit Moskovich said the following: >> From what I've read in "FreeBSD - device drivers" book by Joseph Kong on >> interrupt handling, you cannot voluntarily context switch (that is, sleep) in >> interrupt threads . > See the table at the end of locking(9) manual page. > John is updating that table and has promised (nudge nudge) to get it up to date, but I think that it still is correct for what it says. (there is new stuff to add).
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?519EC574.1070102>