From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 11:44:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 668741065674 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 11:44:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nakaji@jp.freebsd.org) Received: from www.heimat.gr.jp (www.heimat.gr.jp [60.32.13.194]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 081518FC14 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 11:44:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nakaji@jp.freebsd.org) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heimat.gr.jp Received: from ra333.heimat.gr.jp.kankyo-u.ac.jp (ra333.heimat.gr.jp [IPv6:2001:3e0:a84:0:200:4cff:fe17:573c]) by www.heimat.gr.jp (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n18BggEI062281; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 20:42:42 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from nakaji@jp.freebsd.org) From: NAKAJI Hiroyuki To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org References: <20090207.071848.193785503.chat95@mac.com> <20090207.072411.71183618.chat95@mac.com> <1234026184.1562.47.camel@ferret.2hip.net> <86iqnlss4b.fsf@ra333.heimat.gr.jp> <1234081486.1562.74.camel@ferret.2hip.net> Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 20:42:41 +0900 In-Reply-To: <1234081486.1562.74.camel@ferret.2hip.net> (Robert Noland's message of "Sun, 08 Feb 2009 03:24:45 -0500") Message-ID: <86eiy9qhn2.fsf@ra333.heimat.gr.jp> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.0.60 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=13.0 tests=BAYES_00, CONTENT_TYPE_PRESENT,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on www.heimat.gr.jp Cc: Subject: Re: non working DRI on *i386* RADEONX1650+FreeBSD7-stable+Xorg7.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 11:44:07 -0000 Thanks, Robert. I'm now clear. >>>>> In <1234081486.1562.74.camel@ferret.2hip.net> >>>>> Robert Noland wrote: > > 2. Do we need to update the userland, too? > This depends on whether or not any specific API/ABI has been broken. > Normally this should only be observed if shared library versions change. > The above portmanager usage will just deal with it, even if > PORTREVISIONS aren't bumped, though we attempt to bump all needed ports. I updated kernel and userland to 7.1-STABLE anyway. # uname -a FreeBSD ML115.heimat.gr.jp 7.1-STABLE FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE #21: Sun Feb 8 09:49:36 JST 2009 root@ML115.heimat.gr.jp:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ML115 amd64 > > 3. If using portupgrade, is "portupgrade -af" better than > > "portupgrade -rf xorg"? > I haven't used portupgrade in a long time, so I'm not the best person to > answer this. The primary concern is ensuring that all the needed ports > are updated in dependency order. Unless I'm mistaken, portupgrade -rf > xorg is not what you want, as that would try to rebuild everything that > depends on the xorg meta port, which is pretty much nothing. Oh, my typo. It should be "portupgrade -fR". I choosed, then, "make -DALWAYS_BUILD_DEPENDS -DFORCE_PKG_REGISTER install" in x11/xorg. And things seems going well except xfce4, which is another problem. -- NAKAJI Hiroyuki