From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 9 16:15:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C28EC1065674 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 16:15:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B0958FC1B for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 16:15:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m39GE44B003555; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 18:14:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m39GDxFD003551; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 18:14:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 18:13:59 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Eric Zimmerman In-Reply-To: <47FCE40D.5080204@mikestammer.com> Message-ID: <20080409181138.D3535@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <47FCD46B.1060007@mikestammer.com> <20080409165549.A3378@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <47FCE40D.5080204@mikestammer.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd questions Subject: Re: Server build config, what would you do? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 16:15:20 -0000 > > I'd like a C2D to allow for future growth and the fact that it will be > serving files for several people on my home network not to mention the other > services on it. buying computers for future needs is nonsense - as their prices fall all the time. not mentioning that file serving isn't CPU intensive. > > Why do you think no special controller works best? If that was the case, why i don't just think. i'm sure. use gmirror/gstripe/gconcat/combination of them to get best performance. make sure to set -s 1048576 at least in gmirror, and huge stripes (like 512MB) in gstripe. > would they even make hardware based RAID cards, or RAID cards at all? I have because there are people like you willing to pay for them :)