Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 01:20:01 GMT From: David Shane Holden <dpejesh@yahoo.com> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/183688: [maintainer update] security/strongswan 5.0.4 -> 5.1.1 Message-ID: <201311060120.rA61K1K3093571@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/183688; it has been noted by GNATS. From: David Shane Holden <dpejesh@yahoo.com> To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, strongswan@nanoteq.com Cc: Subject: Re: ports/183688: [maintainer update] security/strongswan 5.0.4 -> 5.1.1 Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 20:19:12 -0500 I actually had a patch for this which I was planning on sending, but you beat me to it. I have a couple of questions/suggestions though. * If the config files are going to be used as samples I think they should be moved to share/examples/strongswan instead of being left in etc. I know other ports are dumping samples in etc and I think it's tacky. * I couldn't find any reference to your patch to kernel_pfkey_ipsec.c anywhere. Does it fix a bug or is it just an optimization that you've tested? Either way, seems that it belongs upstream and not a patch in the ports tree since other platforms use the pfkey interface too. * 5.1.0 also added the kernel-libipsec plugin which looks like it might be worth having a config option for. -- Dave
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201311060120.rA61K1K3093571>