From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Mar 29 07:29:07 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA00397
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 29 Mar 1997 07:29:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from etinc.com (et-gw-fr1.etinc.com [204.141.244.98])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA00390
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 29 Mar 1997 07:28:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ntws (ntws.etinc.com [204.141.95.142]) by etinc.com (8.8.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id KAA23263 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 29 Mar 1997 10:32:39 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970329102825.00abab10@etinc.com>
X-Sender: dennis@etinc.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 1997 10:28:28 -0500
To: hackers@freebsd.org
From: dennis <dennis@etinc.com>
Subject: 2.2R real slow with 8 meg
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

	
2.2 is noticably slower with only 8 meg of ram....is this to be expected, or
is there some configuration option that needs to be tweeked? I'm pretty
much using the GENERIC settings.

Dennis