From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 16:22:36 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B676516A41A for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2008 16:22:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.netplex.net (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E0313C4DD for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2008 16:22:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.netplex.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id m14GMVrI029189; Mon, 4 Feb 2008 11:22:31 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.netplex.net) X-Greylist: Message whitelisted by DRAC access database, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.10]); Mon, 04 Feb 2008 11:22:32 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 11:22:31 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net To: "Karl H. Beckers" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <5913.192.9.112.196.1202124683.squirrel@www.our-isp.org> <86ve54epyy.fsf@ds4.des.no> <43451.192.9.112.196.1202141118.squirrel@www.our-isp.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= , freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: threading in FreeBSD (acx_pthreads) X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Eischen List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 16:22:36 -0000 On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Karl H. Beckers wrote: > >> Thanks so far, >> >> acx_pthread is this autoconf m4 macro: >> http://ac-archive.sourceforge.net/ac-archive/acx_pthread.html > > I don't see anything wrong with that macro. If I understand it > correctly, it should work on FreeBSD and pick up "-pthread". One other thing, there is no -kthread any longer (not sure this should even be listed) and I'm unsure about the ordering of lthread vs -pthread. I would think that -pthread would be preferred and should be listed before lthread, but that may depend on what the default library search path is. -- DE