From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Jan 17 15:33:27 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id PAA05148
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 17 Jan 1997 15:33:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id PAA05142;
          Fri, 17 Jan 1997 15:33:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from awfulhak.demon.co.uk (awfulhak.demon.co.uk [158.152.17.1])
          by who.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.11) with ESMTP id PAA03528
          ; Fri, 17 Jan 1997 15:33:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from awfulhak.demon.co.uk (localhost.coverform.lan [127.0.0.1]) by awfulhak.demon.co.uk (8.8.4/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA00943; Fri, 17 Jan 1997 22:57:22 GMT
Message-Id: <199701172257.WAA00943@awfulhak.demon.co.uk>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96
To: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>
cc: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au>, proff@suburbia.net,
        phk@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: ipfw patches to test 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 16 Jan 1997 21:18:24 PST."
             <32DF0BA0.41C67EA6@whistle.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 1997 22:57:21 +0000
From: Brian Somers <brian@awfulhak.demon.co.uk>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Darren Reed wrote:
> > 
> > In some mail from Brian Somers, sie said:
> 
> > > What's the difference between the above and
> > >
> > > ipfw add allow from 192.168.23.0/30 to 140.145.230.0/24
> > > ipfw add deny from any to 140.145.230.0/24
> > 
> > Logically, none.
> not true
> the "not" case will continue on to do other tests in cases where
>  the other example will not

But if you put the "other test" in front of the two lines, it'll be the same :)
Anyway, you're right - it's not the same.

-- 
Brian <brian@awfulhak.demon.co.uk>, <brian@freebsd.org>
      <http://www.awfulhak.demon.co.uk/>
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour....