From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 23 04:13:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2039816A4DE for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 04:13:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dking@ketralnis.com) Received: from ketralnis.com (melchoir.ketralnis.com [68.183.67.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA28843D4C for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 04:13:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dking@ketralnis.com) Received: from [10.0.1.239] (ayla.wifi.int.ketralnis.com [10.0.1.239]) (authenticated bits=0) by ketralnis.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7N4D8Dc037880 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 21:13:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dking@ketralnis.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <20060820052629.59503.qmail@web35608.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20060820052629.59503.qmail@web35608.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <12FAD4D5-B3E1-4A73-84EC-17F1DFF5B5B9@ketralnis.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: David King Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 21:13:02 -0700 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Subject: Re: Accessing device files over the network X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 04:13:10 -0000 > Anyway this morning I was thinking under situations > where this solution is not appropriate whether it was > possible to access device files just by exporting the > /dev filesystem thro' NFS? > Will that work? Are there any gotchas? I hope everybody hasn't forgotten this thread, I'm curious about this myself... It seems like the device node would show up on the remote host like a local device node. That is, the server's major-2,minor-2 device node would, on the client, access the CLIENT's major-2,minor-2 But I hope I'm wrong, because that could be useful