From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Sep 23 14:47:28 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id OAA20397
          for current-outgoing; Mon, 23 Sep 1996 14:47:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA20364
          for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 23 Sep 1996 14:47:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id OAA02833; Mon, 23 Sep 1996 14:45:13 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199609232145.OAA02833@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: ncheck and a multi-lingual fsck
To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 1996 14:45:13 -0700 (MST)
Cc: jez@netcraft.co.uk, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <651.843501290@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Sep 23, 96 10:54:50 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> >  3. go the whole way and submit it as part of a general `cleanup', where
> >     each of the fs-dependent programs (fsck, ncheck, ...) are called by
> >     an fs-independent parent (I'd use mount(8) as the template).
> 
> This idea, I like! :)

You said it was "too SVR4ish" when I suggested it two years ago. 8-(.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.