From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Nov  2 22:40:35 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA10973
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 2 Nov 1997 22:40:35 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers)
Received: from gate.mgt.msk.ru (mgtrep.24h.dialup.ru [194.87.18.139])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA10968
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 2 Nov 1997 22:40:31 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from tarkhil@mgt.msk.ru)
Received: from asteroid.mgt.msk.ru (asteroid.mgt.msk.ru [192.168.133.145])
	by gate.mgt.msk.ru (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id JAA10852;
	Mon, 3 Nov 1997 09:42:12 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from asteroid.mgt.msk.ru (localhost.mgt.msk.ru [127.0.0.1])
	by asteroid.mgt.msk.ru (8.8.7/8.8.6) with ESMTP id JAA19068;
	Mon, 3 Nov 1997 09:39:40 +0300 (MSK)
Message-Id: <199711030639.JAA19068@asteroid.mgt.msk.ru>
To: Brian Somers <brian@awfulhak.org>
cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Reply-To: tarkhil@mgt.msk.ru
Subject: Re: Win 95 PPP faster than pppd? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 02 Nov 1997 00:55:13 GMT."
             <199711020055.AAA20342@awfulhak.demon.co.uk> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 1997 09:39:40 +0300
From: "Alexander B. Povolotsky" <tarkhil@mgt.msk.ru>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> I recently did some quick tests on pppd under -current & 2.2.2.  In 
> comparison, the older 2.2.2 pppd *sucks*.
> 
> pppd 2.3.1 from -current either matched or out-performed user-ppp, 
> and both trod all over pppd from 2.2.2.
Don't you know, can I merge pppd 2.3.1 with -stable?

Alex