From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Apr 18 18:34:39 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from dragon.ham.muohio.edu (dragon.ham.muohio.edu [134.53.141.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3E237BC21 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 18:34:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from howardjp@wam.umd.edu) Received: from localhost (howardjp@localhost) by dragon.ham.muohio.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA04705; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 21:58:57 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: dragon.ham.muohio.edu: howardjp owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 21:58:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Jamie Howard X-Sender: howardjp@dragon.ham.muohio.edu To: Brian Somers Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, brian@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org Subject: Re: Shell games In-Reply-To: <200004182153.WAA00650@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Brian Somers wrote: > > I don't get a lot of time to pay attention to the lists, so this might > > have been asked before. Does the csh->tcsh move imply that sh->ksh will > > be happening soon? Didn't NetBSD do that a while ago? > > *groan* shame on you ! Everyone went a step further and targeted > the sh -> bash war ! I thought I would try to be reasonable ;) Anyway, someone pointed out the -arch discussions about it. I'll slink away now :) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message