Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2001 09:39:56 +1200 (NZST) From: Juha Saarinen <juha@saarinen.org> To: Dave Uhring <duhring@charter.net> Cc: "Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net>, "freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG" <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>, Oliver Fromme <olli@secnetix.de> Subject: Re: JFS Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107080938430.326-100000@vimfuego.saarinen.org> In-Reply-To: <000d01c1074e$49d31ba0$0300a8c0@uhring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 7 Jul 2001, Dave Uhring wrote: > I use "logging" on Solaris and XFS on Linux and have tried reiserfs on > Linux. All are superior to UFS/softupdates when the going gets tough. > Disk access times may or may not be comparable with UFS/softupdates, but > the integrity of my filesystems is more important than raw speed. Hmmm... that's one reason I've not implemented ReiserFS on my Linux box. Read too many horror stories about how it eats your file system, and how it doesn't work with NFS etc. </OT> -- Regards, Juha PGP fingerprint: B7E1 CC52 5FCA 9756 B502 10C8 4CD8 B066 12F3 9544 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.33.0107080938430.326-100000>