Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:18:21 -0700
From:      Garrett Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>
To:        Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Warner Losh <imp@freebsd.org>, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r286995 - head/share/mk
Message-ID:  <C3E4C746-5028-4D41-A2D4-3E0037A9E2D4@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5602DB13.2000202@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201508211515.t7LFFM0U028322@repo.freebsd.org> <56023395.2080904@FreeBSD.org> <CANCZdfrKeV3yXOs-rQ92SquroL1tpFsr=obPa4a=19F%2Bs%2BZuTA@mail.gmail.com> <5602DB13.2000202@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> On Sep 23, 2015, at 10:02, Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>=20
>> On 9/23/2015 9:44 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
>>=20
>>=20
>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 10:07 PM, Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@freebsd.org
>> <mailto:bdrewery@freebsd.org>> wrote:
>>=20
>>>    On 8/21/15 8:15 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
>>> Author: imp
>>> Date: Fri Aug 21 15:15:22 2015
>>> New Revision: 286995
>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/286995
>>>=20
>>> Log:
>>>  Document bsd.progs.mk <http://bsd.progs.mk>, including its
>>    status as being strongly
>>>  discouraged and that it will be going away as soon as is
>>    practicable.
>>>=20
>>> Modified:
>>>  head/share/mk/bsd.README
>>=20
>>    I find this functionality irreplaceable for simplicity. The alternativ=
e
>>    is more Makefiles for simple extra progs. Granted it has meta mode
>>    dirdeps issues but I think that is acceptable as there are other ways t=
o
>>    address that.
>>=20
>>    Where is this deprecation coming from? Is it just due to bapt's
>>    in-progress (but not working) patch at https://reviews.freebsd.org/D34=
44
>>    to remove bsd.progs.mk <http://bsd.progs.mk>; in place of PROGS in
>>    bsd.prog.mk <http://bsd.prog.mk>?
>>=20
>>    I would like to document PROGS properly. I had no idea how it worked
>>    until reading over it tonight. If the plan wasn't to remove PROGS itse=
lf
>>    I will do so.
>>=20
>>=20
>> It doesn't work and has lots of issues. Those issues haven't been fixed.
>> It didn't look like they would be fixed any time soon. It seemed there
>> was a consensus to deprecate it because of those issues.
>> bapt was part of that group, and his problems with packaging that
>> bsd.progs.mk <http://bsd.progs.mk>; creates played into this decision.
>>=20
>> If the issues are fixed, then we can change our recommendations based
>> on the changed circumstance.
>>=20
>> Warner
>=20
> Yes I think I've addressed the issues. I'm still testing and will have
> it committed soon. It is still fragile, but most of share/mk is.

I know you've been playing with meta mode a lot. Have you tried building wit=
h non-meta mode, with MK_TESTS=3Dyes, then run he following steps as root af=
ter a successful installworld?

NOTE: wipe out /usr/tests before running installworld to ensure the files th=
at are present there aren't from previous runs

cd /usr/tests
kyua test

Please add me to the CR.

Thanks,
-NGie=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C3E4C746-5028-4D41-A2D4-3E0037A9E2D4>