From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 4 19:34:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D584316A420 for ; Sat, 4 Mar 2006 19:34:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (it.buh.tecnik93.com [81.196.204.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F23D243D8E for ; Sat, 4 Mar 2006 19:34:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5034417427; Sat, 4 Mar 2006 21:34:11 +0200 (EET) Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 21:34:11 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: Boris Samorodov Message-ID: <20060304213411.53a47eee@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <18621081@srv.sem.ipt.ru> References: <84702749@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20060304205558.58f56036@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <18621081@srv.sem.ipt.ru> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0 (GTK+ 2.8.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [:blank:] file/directory name endings at pkg-plist X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 19:34:28 -0000 On Sat, 04 Mar 2006 22:13:26 +0300 Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Sat, 4 Mar 2006 20:55:58 +0200 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > On Sat, 04 Mar 2006 21:45:38 +0300 > > Boris Samorodov wrote: > > > > FYI here are the ports that have [:blank:] file/directory name endings > > > at pkg-plist. The ports tree was cvsupped at 21:30:00 +0300 from > > > cvsup.freebsd.org. > > > Maybe you could submit a PR containing a patch obtained wit cvs diff -u ? > > I'm not sure if I should. The case is not vital and is not hard to > repair. But the are many maintainers to receive feedback. Or may > portmgr@ approve the commit (I'm not saying before 6.1 and 5.5 > relearse) without maintainer's feedback? Yeh, I just remembered how much I dislike sweeping commits ;) They could since it's a change w/o impact (and I see two ports there belonging to one of them), but I don't know if there's enough reason to do it. Let it live or send a mail per maintainer (eventually with a patch) and if it's not fixed some days after the freeze send-pr. -- IOnut - Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" BOFH excuse #255: Standing room only on the bus