Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 02:15:17 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248474] if_ipsec: NAT broken on IPsec/VTI Message-ID: <bug-248474-7501-OQCJc6VhO2@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-248474-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-248474-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248474 --- Comment #27 from Eugene Grosbein <eugen@freebsd.org> --- (In reply to Ziomalski from comment #26) This is not true: "It is currently not possible to simultanously have Routed IPsec with NAT and Policy IPsec". I have both ipsec-tools/racoon running as IKEv1 daemon with "policy ipsec" for incoming L2TP/IPSec end-user VPNs and strongswan as IKEv2 initiator for LAN-to-LAN "routed ipsec" (ipsec0 interfa= ce) VPN and ipfw nat, works like a charm. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-248474-7501-OQCJc6VhO2>