Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 26 May 2006 16:26:58 +0100
From:      Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net>
To:        "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, patrik <lists@dentarg.net>, freebsd-www@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: RAIDframe
Message-ID:  <20060526152657.GM21998@submonkey.net>
In-Reply-To: <20060526152413.GF1059@zaphod.nitro.dk>
References:  <447491AA.5060009@freebsd.org> <C09CA78A.E570%ceri@submonkey.net> <20060526152413.GF1059@zaphod.nitro.dk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--kfjH4zxOES6UT95V
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 05:24:13PM +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> [Removing -current since this is only about www stuff now]
> On 2006.05.26 12:39:38 +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
> > On 24/5/06 18:02, "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@freebsd.org> wrote:
> >=20
> > > [Adding www@ to CC because this thread reveals a Web site bug.]
> > >=20
> > > If memory serves me right, patrik wrote:
> > >> Scott Long skrev:
> > >>> patrik wrote:
> > >>>=20
> > >> What's going on with RAIDframe?
> > >> What does this menas?
> > >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=3Draid&manpath=3DFreeBSD+7.=
0-current
> > >=20
> > > It means that for some reason, the version of the CURRENT manpages on
> > > the Web site didn't track the removal of the raid(4) manpage.  See he=
re:
> > >=20
> > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/share/man/man4/Attic/raid.4
> > >=20
> > > This is a Web site glitch, nothing more.  :-p
> >=20
> > Actually, it probably just means that sledge still has an old raid(4) m=
anual
> > on it, since that is where I got the CURRENT manpages from the last tim=
e I
> > did the update.
>=20
> Old stuff doesn't get cleared automatically in the update runs on the
> reference systems, but I plan to run "make delete-old" today on sledge
> (just need to play portupgrade -af, mergemaster etc. first).
>=20
> Another way to get a a more or less "clean" version would perhaps be
> to use the monthly snapshots generated by re@?

Agreed.  I remember not being able to find them before, but the new
naming convention will help.

Ceri
--=20
That must be wonderful!  I don't understand it at all.
                                                  -- Moliere

--kfjH4zxOES6UT95V
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFEdx5BocfcwTS3JF8RAhd1AKCiv5TgqkFrKQEZ6yTRc9XQB4mi3gCdHUFg
URNBUiDEJeguYBrJJbQ1q40=
=gUOG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--kfjH4zxOES6UT95V--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060526152657.GM21998>