From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 1 22:20:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CE8416A449 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 22:20:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B9DB43D45 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 22:20:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j71MKPsQ007826 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 22:20:25 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j71MKPju007825; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 22:20:25 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 22:20:25 GMT Message-Id: <200508012220.j71MKPju007825@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org From: Ceri Davies Cc: Subject: Re: docs/84268: chmod(1) manpage's BUGS entry is either wrong or too cryptic X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ceri Davies List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 22:20:25 -0000 The following reply was made to PR docs/84268; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ceri Davies To: "Gary W. Swearingen" Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/84268: chmod(1) manpage's BUGS entry is either wrong or too cryptic Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 23:14:09 +0100 On 31 Jul 2005, at 15:30, Gary W. Swearingen wrote: > Ceri Davies writes: > > >> Failing that, it means 'S' and 'T'. >> > > Then the BUG entry doesn't say what it means and will waste people's > time trying to figure out what it does mean. I agree. > I still think the BUGS section should be removed. I agree. > Or I can make a new patch with: > > There is no "perm" option which sets the sticky bit and also unsets > the execute/search bit, and vice-versa, depending upon the "op" > value. The same applies to each of the setuid and setgid bits. > > There once was a man from Nantucket... > > I sure don't see that as a BUG; just a (good) design decision. I agree. Anyone disagree? (You have two days to say so). Ceri -- Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. -- Einstein (attrib.)