From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 27 05:51:32 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E9EC16A4B3 for ; Sat, 27 Sep 2003 05:51:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.tiadon.com (SMTP.tiadon.com [69.27.132.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F63E44033 for ; Sat, 27 Sep 2003 05:51:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from daleco.biz ([69.27.131.191]) by smtp.tiadon.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sat, 27 Sep 2003 07:43:08 -0500 Message-ID: <3F7587A6.9020300@daleco.biz> Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 07:50:46 -0500 From: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030920 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Richards References: <20030927102448.5c1ea225.davidr@skyforge.net> In-Reply-To: <20030927102448.5c1ea225.davidr@skyforge.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Sep 2003 12:43:09.0321 (UTC) FILETIME=[E7D9E790:01C384F4] cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: routing table looks a mess X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 12:51:32 -0000 David Richards wrote: >Hi > I am currenting running > FreeBSD core-2.skyforge.net 4.8-STABLE FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE #7: Sun Aug 31 20:32:55 BST 2003 davidr@core-2.skyforge.net:/usr/src/sys/compile/CORE i386 > >I added some aliases to my main ethernet card today and added the routes like i normally do. When i looked at the routing tables I saw this: > >core-2# netstat -rn >Routing tables > >Internet: >Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire >default 217.204.199.161 UGSc 115 195 ed0 >9.204.199.171&0xfffffff link#1 UC 0 0 ed0 >9.204.199.172&0xfffffff link#1 UC 0 0 ed0 >127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 2 122 lo0 >217.204.199.160/28 link#1 UC 5 0 ed0 >217.204.199.161 00:20:6f:13:af:f9 UHLW 117 2 ed0 1075 >217.204.199.162 00:c0:df:ee:2a:5b UHLW 0 200 lo0 >217.204.199.163 00:04:5a:0c:94:7b UHLW 0 0 ed0 468 >217.204.199.164 link#1 UHLW 0 4 ed0 >217.204.199.170 00:e0:18:4e:98:44 UHLW 2 4859 ed0 1053 >217.204.199.171 217.204.199.161 UGHS 0 0 ed0 >217.204.199.172 217.204.199.161 UGHS 0 0 ed0 > >Internet6: >Destination Gateway Flags Netif Expire >::1 ::1 UH lo0 >fe80::%ed0/64 link#1 UC ed0 >fe80::2c0:dfff:feee:2a5b%ed0 00:c0:df:ee:2a:5b UHL lo0 >fe80::%lo0/64 fe80::1%lo0 Uc lo0 >fe80::1%lo0 link#3 UHL lo0 >ff01::/32 ::1 U lo0 >ff02::%ed0/32 link#1 UC ed0 >ff02::%lo0/32 ::1 UC lo0 > > >is that normal? > Probably not. >I am able to delete the routes from the table ? > try 'arp -d bad.ip.add.ress' >I had to boot kernel.old coz i couldnt get my 4.9-prerelease to connect to the net. >any ideas ? I am going to cvsup in a build and make world again to see if that fixes anything > It might help. Some code apparently was commited with a small error that produced bigger results ... check the messages from this list. It's been fixed now, I believe. HTH, Kevin Kinsey DaleCo, S.P.