From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Jan 2 00:06:35 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA23865 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Sat, 2 Jan 1999 00:06:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from smtp01.wxs.nl (smtp01.wxs.nl [195.121.6.61]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA23842; Sat, 2 Jan 1999 00:06:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asmodai@wxs.nl) Received: from daemon.ninth-circle.org ([195.121.56.89]) by smtp01.wxs.nl (Netscape Messaging Server 3.6) with ESMTP id AAA6B1B; Sat, 2 Jan 1999 09:06:05 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <199901020256.SAA06141@bubble.didi.com> Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1999 09:13:14 +0100 (CET) Organization: Ninth Circle Enterprises From: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai To: (Satoshi Asami) Subject: Re: Policy on bzip2? Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, ache@FreeBSD.ORG, kkennawa@physics.adelaide.edu.au Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 02-Jan-99 Satoshi Asami wrote: > * From: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai > > * Just make sure the new releases of FreeBSD include bzip as standard then. Or > make > * it so that the dependencies require bzip. Although when we are going to bzip > > Yes, a BUILD_DEPENDS line is a must. And I don't think we need it to > be in /usr/bin, that's exactly what dependencies are for. Why is bzip > any different from, say, gmake or tcl? Sorry, my bad... I forgot we depended on gmake without having it in our bin from start. Anyways, it sound like a good thing to do ;) --- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven Life is the only Pain asmodai(at)wxs.nl we endeavour... Network/Security Specialist BSD & picoBSD: The Power to Serve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message