From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 22 10:05:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5700916A42A; Mon, 22 May 2006 10:05:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vd@datamax.bg) Received: from jengal.datamax.bg (jengal.datamax.bg [82.103.104.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2DF843D68; Mon, 22 May 2006 10:05:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vd@datamax.bg) Received: from qlovarnika.bg.datamax (qlovarnika.bg.datamax [192.168.10.2]) by jengal.datamax.bg (Postfix) with SMTP id C7B22B833; Mon, 22 May 2006 13:05:05 +0300 (EEST) Received: (nullmailer pid 96585 invoked by uid 1002); Mon, 22 May 2006 10:05:05 -0000 Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 13:05:05 +0300 From: Vasil Dimov To: Martin Wilke Message-ID: <20060522100505.GA96520@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> References: <20060521234850.2fd4d360@mwilke.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060521234850.2fd4d360@mwilke.ath.cx> X-OS: FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new categorie "meta" ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: vd@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 10:05:11 -0000 --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 11:48:50PM +0200, Martin Wilke wrote: > Hi Friends, >=20 > since creating new categories comes in vogue lately I just wanted to > ask what you think about creating a categorie called "META". Why you > should do that is simple: There are enough ports serving as meta ports. > These include: >=20 > lang/php4-extensions > lang/php5-extensions > x11/xorg > x11/gnome2 > x11/gnome2-lite > x11/kde3 > x11/kde-lite > x11-wm/xfce4 >=20 > usw. >=20 > That would lead to a clearer layout and improved overview of large > applications (esp for newbies). >=20 I disagree, because the way you look for ports is by their application, not by the port type. Furthermore the presented ports are just not enough for creating new category. --=20 Vasil Dimov gro.DSBeerF@dv Testing can show the presence of bugs, but not their absence. -- Edsger W. Dijkstra --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFEcYzRFw6SP/bBpCARAg8/AKCe5c0KnH0XAiiYvWZJ3SRNkncUzQCeKn3P ptNngKOUJsVIu2nvxQfMwSQ= =GPCW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu--