From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jul 26 21:50:55 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEB9716A4CE
	for <freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:50:55 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from web21110.mail.yahoo.com (web21110.mail.yahoo.com
	[216.136.227.112])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 91F0843D31
	for <freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:50:55 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from materribile@yahoo.com)
Message-ID: <20040726215055.22777.qmail@web21110.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [24.228.74.10] by web21110.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP;
	Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:50:55 PDT
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:50:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mark Terribile <materribile@yahoo.com>
To: Mark Linimon <linimon@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <200407261632.i6QGWUlT076060@freefall.freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: Re: ports/55032: java/jdk13: SVr4 emulation interferes with install
X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD <freebsd-java.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>,
	<mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-java>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-java@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>,
	<mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:50:55 -0000


Mark,

> Old Synopsis: SVr4 emulation interferes with install
> New Synopsis: java/jdk13: SVr4 emulation interferes with install
> 
> State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
> State-Changed-By: linimon
> State-Changed-When: Mon Jul 26 16:29:25 GMT 2004
> State-Changed-Why: 
> Is this still a problem with recent versions of the port?

I don't know, not having tried this particular configuration combination
since.
 
> I am also wondering if this is not the classical problem where
> one needs to bootstrap the JDK install off of another binary-
> based JDK.

Then why does it fail only when SVr4 emulation is installed?  My somewhat
fuzzy recollection was that SVr4 emulation prevented the loader from
interpreting one of the ELF brands correctly, even after I manually reapplied
the brand.

   Mark Terribile



	
		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail