From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 15 11:08:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB4716A401; Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:08:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from flz@xbsd.org) Received: from smtp.xbsd.org (xbsd.org [82.233.2.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A1FE43D45; Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:08:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flz@xbsd.org) Received: from localhost (localhost.xbsd.org [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.xbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7E5C11603; Wed, 15 Mar 2006 12:08:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.xbsd.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (srv1.xbsd.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01476-06; Wed, 15 Mar 2006 12:07:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from mayday.esat.net (mayday.esat.net [193.95.134.156]) by smtp.xbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3597C11494; Wed, 15 Mar 2006 12:07:56 +0100 (CET) From: Florent Thoumie To: Poul-Henning Kamp In-Reply-To: <22176.1142358505@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <22176.1142358505@critter.freebsd.dk> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:07:55 +0000 Message-Id: <1142420875.823.39.camel@mayday.esat.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at xbsd.org Cc: Dag-Erling =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= , Christian Kratzer , Andre Oppermann , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Import src/sys/sys/hash.h from OpenBSD/NetBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:08:10 -0000 On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 18:48 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <20060314184157.V10576@vesihiisi.cksoft.de>, Christian Kratzer writes: > > >> IMHO, Open{BGP,OSPF}D belong in src/contrib, not in ports/net. > > > >please don't bloat the base system with something that can run > >equally well from ports. > > I would tend to agree. > > 90% or more of all FreeBSD systems will not run either of these routing > daemons, so their rightful place is in ports. > > Also, considering the general hazzleness of src/contrib I think ports > offer a far more flexible infrastructure for dealing with the software > (such as openospfd-stable vs openospfd-cvs versions etc.) I'll add openbgpd-devel and openospfd-devel while this is being debated. There are pros and cons having them in src/, but in the meantime it will be available for people willing to test them. -- Florent Thoumie flz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD Committer