From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Sep 14 6:56:16 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from probity.mcc.ac.uk (probity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 120F537B423 for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 06:56:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97]) by probity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #4) id 13ZZUr-000FPc-00 for chat@freebsd.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 14:56:13 +0100 Received: (from jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA08871 for chat@freebsd.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 14:56:13 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jcm) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 14:56:12 +0100 From: j mckitrick To: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: unrelated: mountpoints and backup strategies Message-ID: <20000914145612.C8680@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 02:42:23PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: | j mckitrick writes: | > Ah, I finally discovered that caveat. Too bad, the incremental backup | > concept had me intrigued. Oh, well. I went back to tar and it did | > surprisingly well. I'll stick with that. Now I'll just have an excuse for | > learning shell scripting and perl to make the incremental function work. | | Alternatively, you could RTFM (in this case, 'man tar'). Funny you should say that. I am having a weird week, and i'm overlooking the details i normally wouldn't. I even have a coffee mug with 'RTFM' on it. Maybe i should drink it right handed so *I* see the message. :) jcm -- "I drank WHAT ?!" - Socrates To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message