From owner-freebsd-net  Tue May 12 11:06:46 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA20180
          for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 12 May 1998 11:06:46 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from gvr.gvr.org (root@gvr.gvr.org [194.151.74.97])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA19352;
          Tue, 12 May 1998 11:03:09 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from guido@gvr.org)
Received: (from guido@localhost)
	by gvr.gvr.org (8.8.8/8.8.5) id UAA18013;
	Tue, 12 May 1998 20:02:27 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.org>
Message-Id: <199805121802.UAA18013@gvr.gvr.org>
Subject: Re: INRIA IPv6 on FreeBSD
In-Reply-To: <199805121340.VAA15063@spinner.netplex.com.au> from Peter Wemm at "May 12, 98 09:40:54 pm"
To: peter@netplex.com.au (Peter Wemm)
Date: Tue, 12 May 1998 20:02:27 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: pete@sms.fi, dag-erli@ifi.uio.no, net@FreeBSD.ORG, core@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

> 
> I believe one of the NetBSD folks suggested that they were intending on =
> 
> using the INRIA stack as their baseline.  I don't know if that's still th=
> e =
> 
> plan there or not.

Same for OpenBSD. I once brought up the subject but the general feeling
of otehrs was that it would not have the encryption stuff in. I
don't really care. We can bring it in from somewhere else.
>From what I've heart, the INRIA stack is indeed a good one so I would
opt for the INRIA one (I do not have personal experience with it though).

-Guido

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message