Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 11:06:04 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 36551 for review Message-ID: <20030822180604.GB849@dhcp42.pn.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20030822125414.jhb@FreeBSD.org> References: <20030821192214.GA25805@ns1.xcllnt.net> <XFMail.20030822125414.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 12:54:14PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > > Going to the source: in acpi_parse_resources() we need to create > > a callback to MD code to tell it about polarity and mode. This > > means tweaking the ACPI_RSTYPE_IRQ or ACPI_RSTYPE_EXT_IRQ cases. > > Better would be to create bus methods for this (see for example > > acpi_res_set_irq()). > > Yes. For i386 definitely it would make sense to have a bus method > that bubbles back up to the nexus(4) and eventually calls the > MD interrupt code. Maybe some kind of interrupt properties kobj > interface: The impact of a seperate KOBJ interface is probably large. I can't think of a use of this object that's unrelated to the bus object. If we do have such an use, then it should probably be a seperate interface, otherwise I think we should just add new methods to the bus interface. I first need to finish a couple of other things, but then I can spend some time on it. Don't wait for me :-) -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030822180604.GB849>