Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 08:25:17 -0500 From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Rewrite cvsup & portupgrade in C Message-ID: <200407070825.18046.kirk@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: <p06002039bd11631ca135@[10.0.1.3]> References: <E1Bhd1M-000KEo-Nz@smp500.sitetronics.com> <20040707070012.GC38356@dragon.nuxi.com> <p06002039bd11631ca135@[10.0.1.3]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Boundary-02=_+m/6AELql+RHF8l Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 07 July 2004 03:23 am, Brad Knowles wrote: > I'm confused. Once these applications are in binary form, what > difference does it make what language they were written in? You have to get it into binary first. EZM3 is not available on many=20 non-FreeBSD, non-Intel platforms. Although it's used *primarily* by the=20 =46reeBSD project, it seems like there would be enough of a demand for such= a=20 thing that other a portable version would be readily adopted by other=20 projects. I see that there is no cvsup binary package for ia64. Does M3 build on tha= t=20 platform? Do you suppose that "csup" will when it's finished? =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --Boundary-02=_+m/6AELql+RHF8l Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBA6/m+5sRg+Y0CpvERAgFUAJ43Vm8ObxqVD+LxscObnl6jBzYggACgh6N5 2DtxJ43UsybHLwrj4S3MupI= =gU7d -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_+m/6AELql+RHF8l--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200407070825.18046.kirk>