Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 16:05:57 -0800 From: Gary Kline <kline@tao.thought.org> To: Jim Mock <jim@luna.cdrom.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KDE tree? Message-ID: <20000331160557.B35152@tao.thought.org> In-Reply-To: <20000331152145.A2827@luna.cdrom.com>; from jim@luna.cdrom.com on Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 03:21:45PM -0800 References: <200003312226.OAA34850@tao.thought.org> <20000331150914.A2536@luna.cdrom.com> <20000331151713.A35152@tao.thought.org> <20000331152145.A2827@luna.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 03:21:45PM -0800, Jim Mock wrote: > On Fri, 31 Mar 2000 at 15:17:13 -0800, Gary Kline wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 03:09:14PM -0800, Jim Mock wrote: > > > On Fri, 31 Mar 2000 at 14:26:27 -0800, Gary Kline wrote: > > > > Sorry if this has been debated before, but why don't we have a KDE > > > > (and GNOME) tree with links to all the appropriate KDE/GNOME utils? > > > > > > Such as? I'm not sure I'm following what you're asking. Are you > > > talking about something like the meta ports for each > > > (/usr/ports/x11/kde11 and /usr/ports/x11/gnome)? > > > > > > > Yeah, that's exactly what I'm looking for. I did a > > Ah, ok, good. You had me wondering there for a minute :-) > > > % locate kde > > > > but didn't see the kde11 in my ports tree. If these branches are > > there, I certainly missed it!! > > Hmm, yeah, perhaps it should be just 'kde' since we only have one > version in the tree.. (kde11-i18n would become kde-i18n). Anyone else > have comments on this? > I vote for the Keep it Simple, Sir approach. kde should be just fine. gary -- Gary D. Kline kline@tao.thought.org Public service Unix To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000331160557.B35152>