From owner-freebsd-current  Fri May 29 22:03:26 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA19204
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Fri, 29 May 1998 22:03:26 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA19190
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 29 May 1998 22:03:22 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1])
	by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA17658;
	Fri, 29 May 1998 22:03:41 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
To: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no>
cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: I see one major problem with DEVFS... 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 30 May 1998 07:00:00 +0200."
             <19980530070000.29794@follo.net> 
Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 22:03:41 -0700
Message-ID: <17654.896504621@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> If we're talking a true mknod, I still stand by the comment.  If we're
> talking a compatibility hack that look like mknod, that's another cupe

I don't see the difference in relation to devfs?

- Jordan

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message