From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 4 09:19:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C3BF16A4CE for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 09:19:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pernis.its.uu.se (pernis.its.UU.SE [130.238.4.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B262043D31 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 09:19:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ante@Update.UU.SE) Received: by pernis.its.uu.se (Postfix, from userid 205) id A6A5619F; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 10:19:05 +0100 (MEZ) Received: from pernis.its.uu.se(127.0.0.1) by pernis.its.uu.se via virus-scan id s305; Tue, 4 Jan 05 10:18:56 +0100 Received: from Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE [130.238.19.25]) by pernis.its.uu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id D819A203; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 10:18:55 +0100 (MEZ) Received: by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix, from userid 30086) id C67FD38014; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 10:18:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix) with ESMTP id C51AD5C002; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 10:18:55 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 10:18:55 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Davour To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20050103190209.GA94524@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: References: <20050103190209.GA94524@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem compiling gcc3.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 09:19:08 -0000 On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 10:02:17AM +0100, Andreas Davour wrote: >> >> Hi! >> >> On my FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE GENERIC (yeah, I will upgrade soon) I can't >> get the gcc3.4 port to compile. >> >> Unless I'm mistaken, gcc3.4 is used for 5.3 nowdays. Do I dare to >> upgrade to 5.3 or do I have the chance of ending up with a broken >> compiler? > > 5.3 doesn't use the gcc port to compile the base system, it includes a > version of gcc. You have nothing to worry about here. Excellent. I thought so, but confirmation calms my fears. >> Or, is it just that the port is broken for 5.2? I haven't found any >> hints in UPDATING. > > 5.2 is no longer officially supported by the ports collection, so > problems of this nature are not tracked. Time to learn mergemaster and do that upgrade then... Thanks Kris! /andreas -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?